Global  

Biden wins Scientific American's first endorsement in 175 years

FOXNews.com Wednesday, 16 September 2020 ()
Scientific American focused on the president's response to the novel coronavirus, but editors also emphasized that Trump's shortcomings and "refusal to look at the evidence and act accordingly [extend] beyond the virus."
0
shares
ShareTweetSavePostSend
 
Video Credit: Wochit Business - Published
News video: Scientific American Breaks With 175-Year Tradition By Endorsing A Presidential Candidate

Scientific American Breaks With 175-Year Tradition By Endorsing A Presidential Candidate 00:38

Scientific American was founded in 1845 and is one of the oldest continuously published magazines in the country. Throughout its 175-year history, it has never endorsed a US presidential candidate. Until now. The publication's editors announced Tuesday that the magazine was endorsing Democratic...

You Might Like


Related videos from verified sources

'Scientific American' Backs Biden in First-Ever Endorsement [Video]

'Scientific American' Backs Biden in First-Ever Endorsement

The endorsement by 'Scientific American' was posted online in an editorial on Tuesday.

Credit: Cover Video STUDIO     Duration: 01:06Published

Related news from verified sources

Scientific American Makes First Presidential Endorsement in 175-Year History: ‘Time to Move Trump Out and Elect Biden’

Scientific American Makes First Presidential Endorsement in 175-Year History: ‘Time to Move Trump Out and Elect Biden’
Scientific American made its first presidential endorsement in the publication's 175-year history -- calling to vote out President Donald Trump and elect Joe...
Mediaite

Science mag makes first endorsement in 175 years, taps Biden

NEW YORK (AP) — Even though Scientific American had never endorsed a presidential candidate in the magazine's 175-year history, its top editor said Tuesday...
SeattlePI.com

Scientific American magazine backs Joe Biden, its first presidential endorsement in 175 years

The editors of the 175-year-old magazine wrote that they felt compelled to speak out because Trump "rejects evidence and science."
USATODAY.com


Tweets about this