Celebrating 10 Years of Trusted News Discovery
One News Page
> >

Supreme Court to hear sexual orientation, gender identity employment cases

CNA Wednesday, 24 April 2019
Washington D.C., Apr 24, 2019 / 03:30 am (CNA).- In a decision that could have potentially far-reaching consequences, the U.S. Supreme Court has said it will hear cases involving claims that sexual orientation and gender identity should be included under current federal protections barring sex discrimination.

One case involves a male employee who identifies as a woman and was fired from a funeral home for deciding to wear women’s clothes to work.

John Bursch, vice president of appellate advocacy at the religious freedom legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, argued that the court should uphold current federal law.

“Neither government agencies nor the courts have authority to rewrite federal law by replacing ‘sex’ with ‘gender identity’—a change with widespread consequences for everyone,” he said April 22.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said it would hear the cases in the upcoming court term, with decisions and opinions possible in 2020.

Alliance Defending Freedom is backing the funeral home at the center of one case, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

The family-owned funeral home, owned by Tom Roost, has operated since 1910 and now has several chapels.

In 2007 it hired a male employee who agreed to follow the company’s policies, including its sex-specific dress code. The ADF summary of the case said the dress code is “crafted to emphasize professionalism and keep the focus on those mourning the loss of a loved one.”

In 2013, the employee told Roost that he intended to begin dressing as a woman at work.

“Tom determined that allowing this would not be in the best interests of his clients processing their grief,” Alliance Defending Freedom said on its website summary of the case. “He offered the employee a severance package, which the employee refused.”

The employee, who now goes by Aimee Stephens, wrote to colleagues that year: “What I must tell you is very difficult for me and is taking all the courage I can muster... I have felt imprisoned in a body that does not match my mind, and this has caused me great despair and loneliness.”

Stephens filed suit on legal grounds including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a federal law which bars discrimination on categories including race, religion, national origin and sex.

In 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan backed the funeral home. However, the EEOC appealed the case, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit then ruled that the dress code was discriminatory against a male employee who identifies as a woman.

“It is analytically impossible to fire an employee based on that employee’s status as a transgender person without being motivated, at least in part, by the employee’s sex,” said the appellate court, according to the New York Times. “Discrimination ‘because of sex’ inherently includes discrimination against employees because of a change in their sex.”

Bursch, who served as solicitor general of Michigan from 2011 to 2013, said the funeral home wanted “to serve families mourning the loss of a loved one.” He charged “the EEOC has elevated its political goals above the interests of the grieving people that the funeral home serves.”

“Businesses have the right to rely on what the law is—not what government agencies want it to be—when they create and enforce employment policies,” Bursch added.

The Supreme Court accepted the funeral home case on the limited questions of whether Title VII bars discrimination against self-identified transgender people based on “their status as transgender” or “sex stereotyping” under a 1989 Supreme Court decision, Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins.

Alliance Defending Freedom’s brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court argued that the Sixth Circuit’s interpretation “undermines the primary purpose for banning discrimination based on sex,” namely to ensure equal opportunities for women and to eliminate workplace inequalities that have held women back.

If the lower court’s interpretation holds, it said, employment reserved for women like playing basketball in the WNBA or working at a shelter for abused women “now must be opened to males who identify as women.” Such a definition would also undermine Title IX efforts to advance women’s participation in sports and educational opportunities, it said.

“Substituting ‘gender identity’ for ‘sex’ in nondiscrimination laws also threatens freedom of conscience,” the ADF petition added, saying that such interpretations have forced doctors to participate in surgical efforts to alter sex “in violation of their deeply held beliefs” and best medical judgment.

“In sum, the Sixth Circuit ushered in a profound change in federal law accompanied by widespread legal and social ramifications,” the legal group charged.

Two other cases, Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express, Inc. vs. Zarda, will also go before the Supreme Court. They were consolidated because of similar claims regarding employer discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, National Public Radio reports.

The case Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda involves the late New York skydiving instructor Donald Zarda, who said he was fired because he was gay. He was fired after a female customer complained. She had voiced concerns about being tightly tied to Zarda during a tandem dive, and Zarda tried to reassure her by telling her he was “100% gay,” the New York Times reports.

Zarda was killed in a skydiving accident in 2014 but his estate is continuing to pursue the case.

A divided 13-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled that the lawsuit could proceed.

Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann, writing the court’s majority opinion, said “sexual orientation discrimination is motivated, at least in part, by sex and is thus a subset of sex discrimination.” Sexual orientation discrimination is “predicated on assumptions about how persons of a certain sex can or should be, which is an impermissible basis for adverse employment actions.”

“(S)exual orientation discrimination—which is motivated by an employer’s opposition to romantic association between particular sexes—is discrimination based on the employee’s own sex,” Katzmann’s decision added.

The case Bostock v. Clayton County involves a Georgia child welfare services coordinator who said he was fired for being gay, the New York Times reports.

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in July 2018 issued an unsigned opinion citing a 1979 5th circuit court decision ruling that firing for homosexuality is not barred by Title VII.

Most federal courts do not consider sexual orientation discrimination to be a form of sex discrimination, the New York Times reports.

EEOC publications on the commission website hold that “sex stereotypes” like “the belief that men should only date women or that women should only marry men” constitute illegal discrimination on the basis of sex. They say that the 1964 civil rights legislation against sex discrimination in the workplace includes discrimination “based on an applicant or employee’s gender identity or sexual orientation.”

However, those opinions lack Congressional approval. Proposed legislation known as the Equality Act would add “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” as protected categories under federal law.

Critics have warned that the legislation explicitly rejects religious freedom protections and would open the gates to anti-discrimination lawsuits against religious believers and institutions who disagree with the bill’s broad view of what constitutes LGBT discrimination.

Recent related videos from verified sources

U.S. Court Orders Review Of Judge's Ruling To End Trump's Ban On Transgender Military Personnel [Video]U.S. Court Orders Review Of Judge's Ruling To End Trump's Ban On Transgender Military Personnel

President Donald Trump has achieved a victory in his effort to ban most transgender people from the military. According to Reuters, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday set aside a ruling by..

Credit: Wochit News     Duration: 00:38Published

US Court Rules Against Trump Administration In Abortions For unaccompanied Immigrant Minors [Video]US Court Rules Against Trump Administration In Abortions For unaccompanied Immigrant Minors

The U.S. appeals court delivered a blow regarding immigration to the Trump administration policy. The court ruled the U.S. government cannot deny access to abortions for unaccompanied immigrant minors..

Credit: Wochit News     Duration: 00:32Published

Supreme Court Rebuffs Bid To Expand Legal Protections For Gun Silencers [Video]Supreme Court Rebuffs Bid To Expand Legal Protections For Gun Silencers

According to Reuters, The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a bid to widen legal protections for gun silencers in a case involving two Kansas men convicted for failing to register the devices as..

Credit: Wochit     Duration: 00:48Published

Over 40 Prosecutors Refuse To Enforce New Anti-Abortion Laws [Video]Over 40 Prosecutors Refuse To Enforce New Anti-Abortion Laws

According to Huffington Post, Dozens of state and local prosecutors released a statement Friday vowing not to enforce extreme anti-abortion restrictions recently passed in their states. The statement..

Credit: Wochit News     Duration: 00:51Published

Kevin Spacey Makes Surprise Court Appearance In Groping Case [Video]Kevin Spacey Makes Surprise Court Appearance In Groping Case

Famed movie and television star Kevin Spacey unexpectedly showed up in a Nantucket courtroom Monday. According to Newser, the 59-year-old was there for a pre-trial hearing in the groping case against..

Credit: Wochit News     Duration: 00:35Published

Taylor Swift Pens Letter in Support of LGBTQ Equality [Video]Taylor Swift Pens Letter in Support of LGBTQ Equality

Taylor Swift Pens Letter in Support of LGBTQ Equality Swift recently wrote to Tennessee’s Republican Senator, Lamar Alexander, in support of LGBTQ rights and gender equality. The Tennessee-based..

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories     Duration: 01:13Published

Julian Castro Unveils Plan For Police Reform [Video]Julian Castro Unveils Plan For Police Reform

2020 Democratic Contender Julian Castro has unvelied a new plan to tackle police reform. Castro aims to prevent the police shootings of unarmed people of color that have prompted national outrage in..

Credit: Wochit News     Duration: 00:37Published

Historic Moments in the Fight for LGBTQ Equality [Video]Historic Moments in the Fight for LGBTQ Equality

Historic Moments in the Fight for LGBTQ Equality January, 1958 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the nations first pro-gay publication, ONE: The Homosexual Magazine, after the U.S. Post Office..

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories     Duration: 01:46Published

Recent related news from verified sources

United States: Supreme Court Rules That Employers Who Do Not Timely Assert Failure To Exhaust Administrative Remedies In Employment Discrimination Cases Risk Waiving The Defense - Duane Morris LLP

In a unanimous decision issued on June 3, 2019, in Fort Bend County v. Davis, the Supreme Court of the United States held that an employment discrimination...

Scotland’s next census will ask about sexuality and gender identity

But intersex people aren't included in the sex question. The post Scotland’s next census will ask about sexuality and gender identity appeared first on...

Homophobia now a crime in Brazil

*Brasilia:* Brazil's Supreme Court voted Thursday to criminalise homophobia, an important step for sexual minorities in one of the most dangerous countries for...

Census question, gerrymandering among cases still to be decided by Supreme Court

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg warned Friday that some upcoming cases could be decided along 5-4 votes
CBS News Also reported by •

United States: Iowa Supreme Court Upholds Amendments Narrowing Bargaining Rights For Public Sector Unions - Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

The Iowa Supreme Court released five eagerly awaited opinions upholding the 2017 amendments to the Public Employment Relations Act (PERA).

Supreme Court to hear 3 major cases that could impact 2020

June marks the final month the U.S. Supreme Court is in session, and with just over two weeks left, there are three cases which could potentially impact the 2020...
CBS News Also reported by •Seattle Times

Florist can’t refuse to provide flowers for same-sex wedding, state supreme court rules again

The Washington Supreme Court has ruled again against a Christian florist who refused to provide flowers for a same-sex couple’s wedding on the grounds…
ABA Journal

Alaska Supreme Court rules state sex offender registry law unconstitutional

The Alaska Supreme Court ruled that a state law requiring the registry of all sex offenders is unconstitutional because it violates offenders' rights to due... Also reported by •Seattle Times

You Might Like

Environmentally friendly: One News Page is hosted on servers powered solely by renewable energy
© 2019 One News Page Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
About us  |  Contact us  |  Disclaimer  |  Press Room  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Content Accreditation
 RSS  |  News for my Website  |  Free news search widget  |  In the News  |  DMCA / Content Removal  |  Privacy & Data Protection Policy
How are we doing? FeedbackSend us your feedback  |   LIKE us on Facebook   FOLLOW us on Twitter  •  FOLLOW us on Pinterest
One News® is a registered trademark of One News Page Ltd.