Global  

“The world's speediest news portal”
One News Page
> >

Abortion info required at pro-life centers? Supreme Court takes up case

CNA Tuesday, 14 November 2017
Washington D.C., Nov 14, 2017 / 02:35 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The U.S. Supreme Court has announced that it will consider a California law that requires pro-life pregnancy centers to display information about how to obtain an abortion.

Opponents of the law welcomed the high court’s Nov. 13 decision to hear the case.

“Forcing anyone to provide free advertising for the abortion industry is unthinkable – especially when it’s the government doing the forcing,” said Kevin Theriot, senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom.

“This is even more true when it comes to pregnancy care centers, which exist specifically to care for women who want to have their babies.”

Given that information about abortion is already widely available, “the government doesn’t need to punish pro-life centers for declining to advertise for the very act they can’t promote,” Theriot said.

“The state should protect freedom of speech and freedom from coerced speech.”

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a legal complaint filed by Alliance Defending Freedom against the law. The complaint was filed on behalf of a pro-life pregnancy care network, and two pregnancy care centers.

California’s Assembly Bill 775, called the Reproductive FACT Act, requires licensed medical centers that offer free pro-life help to pregnant women to post a notice saying that California provides free or low-cost abortion and contraceptive services. The notice must include a phone number for a county office that would refer women to Planned Parenthood or other abortion providers.

Under the law, unlicensed pregnancy centers must also add large disclosures about their status as a non-medical provider, even if they do not provide medical services.

The petition, filed in March, charges that the legislation was enacted with the aim of targeting pro-life pregnancy centers based on their viewpoint that discourages abortion.

Alliance Defending Freedom said that courts have invalidated similar laws or parts of similar laws in Austin, Texas; Baltimore and Montgomery County, Maryland; and New York City.

The California legislature said that 200 pregnancy centers used “intentionally deceptive advertising and counseling practices” that confuse and misinform women and intimidate them “from making fully-informed, time-sensitive decisions about critical health care.”

The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law. Judge Dorothy W. Nelson, writing for the unanimous three-judge panel, said the state of California has “a substantial interest in the health of its citizens, including ensuring that its citizens have access to and adequate information about constitutionally protected medical services like abortion,” according to the New York Times.

Judge Nelson said the notice “informs the reader only of the existence of publicly funded family-planning services” and “does not contain any more speech than necessary, nor does it encourage, suggest or imply that women should use those state-funded services.”

But Elissa Graves, legal counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom, contended that the law enables the abortion industry.

“Planned Parenthood, which makes millions from abortion, deceives women into believing that abortion is their only choice,” Graves said.

“Pregnancy care centers, which provide their care for free, were established specifically to help women understand that they have the choice of life for their children, and that they will be there to help them through their pregnancies.”
0
shares
Share on
Facebook
Share on
Twitter
Post on 
Reddit
Share by
Email
 
Source: Wibbitz Studio - < > Embed
News video: U.S. Supreme Court will decide if clinics can object California abortion law

▶ U.S. Supreme Court will decide if clinics can object California abortion law 00:50

A California law states that clinics should communicate with patients about seeking low-cost options for contraception and abortion through public programs. But some religiously-affiliated clinics object because they believe abortion is a sin. So, these clinics challenged the Supreme Court to review...

You Might Like


Recent related news

Dispute on eye drop size fails to catch Supreme Court's eye

WASHINGTON (AP) — A dispute about the size of eye drops has failed to catch the eye of the Supreme Court. Drug companies including Allergan, Bausch & Lomb,...
SeattlePI.com - HealthAlso reported by •Seattle TimesNewsmaxIndiaVision

Supreme Court justices relist abortion case multiple times

Supreme Court justices have been considering whether to hear a case involving an immigrants teen’s abortion—multiple times.The court was scheduled to...
ABA Journal - LegalAlso reported by •DNAFirstpostMondaq

Supreme Court disarms BS Yeddyurappa, gives him 24 hrs to prove strength

A three-member Supreme Court bench, headed by Justice AK Sikri and comprising Justices Arvind Bobde and Ashok Bhushan, directed a floor test of the MLAs in...
DNA - Front PageAlso reported by •Seattle Times

Can't punish boss for suicide of 'overburdened' junior: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Thursday quashed a criminal case registered against a senior Maharashtra Education Department officer, charged with abetting suicide of his...
DNA - Front PageAlso reported by •Seattle Times

Switzerland: Swiss Federal Supreme Court Confirms Limited Arbitrability Of Domestic Employment Disputes In New Leading Case - Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd

On 4 May 2018 the Swiss Federal Supreme Court published leading case 4A_7/2018 dated 18 April 2018, which has been marked for inclusion in the official court...
Mondaq - Legal

Judge Loya verdict: Bombay Lawyers Association files petition in Supreme Court seeking review of apex court's judgment

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a review of the apex court's verdict, which rejected the demand for an independent probe into the death of...
Firstpost - India


Tweets about this


Other recent news in Religion

ABORTION does not protect women’s rights, Vatican official saysPunggye-ri nuclear site destroyed in NORTH KOREA (AsiaNews)
Pope makes surprise visit to SCHOOL named after book-loving child

Recent related videos

News video: Top court hears arguments in journalism case

▶ Top court hears arguments in journalism case 02:36

Vice Media's Ben Makuch says police shouldn't be able to use journalists to further their investigations, and is at the Supreme Court fighting a lower court ruling that he must give background..
Source: Canadian Press - Affiliate -

News video: Michelle Williams Joins Amazon's 'This Is Jane'

▶ Michelle Williams Joins Amazon's 'This Is Jane' 00:32

Michelle Williams has signed up to appear in the Amazon Studios project 'This Is Jane.' The project tells the true story of a Chicago woman named Jenny. Jenny founded and ran an underground abortion..
Source: Wochit Entertainment -

News video: Texas School Shooter Cannot Receive The Death Penalty

▶ Texas School Shooter Cannot Receive The Death Penalty 00:59

Getty Images/Scott Olsen The suspected Santa Fe high-school shooter cannot be sentenced to death or life in prison without possibility of parole. That's because the suspect is just 17 years old. Two..
Source: Wochit News -

News video: US Supreme Court will hear 90s murder case

▶ US Supreme Court will hear 90s murder case 01:41

The US Supreme Court said they will hear a decades old murder case from Oklahoma.
Source: Rumble -

News video: The Supreme Court's big decision on arbitration, explained

▶ The Supreme Court's big decision on arbitration, explained 02:22

The Supreme Court ruled May 21 that companies can require workers to accept individual arbitration. The Post's Robert Barnes explains why that's significant.
Source: The Washington Post - Affiliate -

News video: Congress welcomes Supreme Court’s order on live-telecasting of Karnataka floor test

▶ Congress welcomes Supreme Court’s order on live-telecasting of Karnataka floor test 01:24

New Delhi, May 19 (ANI): Senior Congress leader and advocate, Abhishek Manu Singhvi on Saturday expressed his satisfaction over Supreme Court’s order on pro tem speaker for Karnataka’s..
Source: News unlimited -

News video: SC rejects Congress-JD(S) plea against appointment of pro tem speaker KG Bopaiah

▶ SC rejects Congress-JD(S) plea against appointment of pro tem speaker KG Bopaiah 01:23

New Delhi, May 19 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Saturday rejected Congress-JD(S) plea where they had challenged the appointment of pro tem speaker KG Bopaiah. The SC said that Bopaiah will continue to be..
Source: News unlimited -

News video: Congress, JD(S) desperate to remove KG Bopaiah as pro tem speaker: Mukul Rohatgi

▶ Congress, JD(S) desperate to remove KG Bopaiah as pro tem speaker: Mukul Rohatgi 01:19

New Delhi, May 19 (ANI): Former Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi on Saturday said that Congress and Janata Dal (Secular) are desperate to remove KG Bopaiah from the post of pro tem speaker. Speaking to..
Source: News unlimited -

Environmentally friendly: One News Page is hosted on servers powered solely by renewable energy
© 2018 One News Page Ltd. All Rights Reserved.  |  About us  |  Disclaimer  |  Press Room  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Content Accreditation
 RSS  |  News for my Website  |  Free news search widget  |  Help  |  Contact us  |  DMCA / Content Removal  |  Privacy & Data Protection Policy
How are we doing? Send us your feedback  |   LIKE us on Facebook   FOLLOW us on Twitter   FIND us on Google+