It’s Weird That Michael Jackson’s 2005 Trial Hasn’t Gotten the ‘People v OJ Simpson’ Treatment
Wednesday, 13 March 2019 It’s fitting that Michael Jackson’s 2005 trial ended with a woman releasing white doves — one for each count on which he was acquitted. Doves are a traditional part of magic shows, and Jackson’s trial may have been his greatest trick of all. We discuss why in the latest “Shoot This Now” podcast, available on Apple or right here:
On every episode of “Shoot This Now,” we talk about true stories that should be made into TV shows and movies. This week, we talk about the 2005 Michael Jackson trial, which I covered from beginning to end for The Associated Press.
*Also Read:* When Fred Durst and Kurt Loder Faced Off for the Soul of Rock 'n' Roll (Podcast)
As the new Dan Reed documentary “Leaving Neverland” makes clear, the trial continued a long Jackson tradition of manipulating the people around him. Wade Robson describes in the documentary how Jackson persuaded him to lie on the stand about being molested. And the news media (myself included) sometimes paid attention to his pajama-and-epaulette ensembles instead of everything Jackson wanted to hide.
Jackson’s family has denied that he committed any wrongdoing, and called “Leaving Neverland” an unfair and one-sided account, and said Robson’s testimony that Jackson never molested him undercuts the detailed accusations he makes in the documentary.
Robson said in “Leaving Neverland” that Jackson persuaded him to lie in part by playing on his sympathies. Robson feared for Jackson’s life if he went to prison, and with good reason. As we noted in the podcast, Jackson was about six-feet tall and 120 pounds at the time of the trial, often checking into a local hospital for a persistent back injury and other health problems.
Meanwhile, Jackson’s gifted attorney, Thomas Mesereau, was a master of legal arts, guiding witnesses who were barely in their teens into contradicting themselves on the stand. He said Jackson was not a predator, but the victim of a setup, and that the young accuser’s mother — who was, bizarrely, gained the name Janet Jackson through marriage — was a serial grifter trying to make him look guilty.
She had a history of people accusing her of using her children to make money, and did herself no favors with testimony that was both evasive and abrasive.
Was there anyone to root for? Certainly Robson, especially knowing what we know now. But also at least one of the prosecutors, for reasons we explain in the podcast. And Janet Jackson — not the accuser’s mother, but the original Janet Jackson, Michael’s sister, who put herself on the line to defend her brother soon after weathering her own Super Bowl scandal — one she didn’t deserve.
Will the trial ever get the “People v. OJ Simpson” treatment it deserves? FX did not immediately get back to us. The details of the Jackson case may be too repugnant or depressing — but so were the crimes at the center of “The People v. OJ Simpson.”
If you like this episode of “Shoot This Now,” we hope you’ll subscribe to the podcast and let us know what you think of the episode here.
*Related stories from TheWrap:*
Angela James' Life Story Is the Hockey Movie We Need Now (Podcast)
How Tekashi 69 Went From Hip-Hop to Facing a Life Sentence (Podcast)
When Fred Durst and Kurt Loder Faced Off for the Soul of Rock 'n' Roll (Podcast)
Accused killer Joseph McAlpin insisted he's no monster during closing arguments of his murder trial Monday. McAlpin is charged with the 2017 Good Friday murders of Michael and Trina Kuznik inside Mr...