Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments In Birth Control, Religious Freedom Rule

Matt Petrillo reports.

WE THANK YOU ONE AND ALL,SCALED BACK OPERATION THERE ISDUE TO THE DECLINE IN CASES INTHE CITY.THE COUNTRY'S HIGHESTCOURT ONCE AGAIN WILL HAVE TODECIDE WOMAN'S ACCESS OF BIRTHCONTROL AGAINST RELIGIOUSFREEDOM.EXPLAINING HOW PENNSYLVANIAPLAYS A KEY ROLE IN THE CASE.ISSUE THE TRUMPADMINISTRATION WANTS TO MAKEIT EASIER FOR PRIVATEEMPLOYERS TO OPT OUT TOPROVIDE CONTRACEPTIONCOVERAGE.BUT, LAWYERS FROM THEPENNSYLVANIA AND NEW JERSEYATTORNEY'S GENERAL OFFICETOGETHER ARGUE THAT TRUMPADMINISTRATION'S RULE ISUNLAWFUL.THE HEARING HELD NOT AT THESUPREME COURT, BUT OVER A TELECONFERENCE, ARGUE THEAFFORDABLE CARE ACT OROBAMACARE PASSED BACK IN 2010MANDATES EMPLOYERS PROVIDECOVERAGE FOR A FULL SPECTRUMOF BIRTH CONTROL OPTIONS AT NOCOST TO THE PATIENTS IN THEIRINSURANCE PLANS.THE NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONCENTER HELD A DISCUSSION OVERTHE MAT THEY ARE AFTERNOON.THIS IS ONE OF THE CRITICALCONTESTS IN OUR CULTURE NANOUR COURTS RIGHT NOW, WHICH ISHOW TO -- THE CONVERSATIONBETWEEN ADVANCING EQUALITYPRINCIPALS AND THE TENDON SHAHTHAT IS CREATING, REALLY,INSTITUTION, ASSERTINGRELIGIOUS OBJECTION.THE CASES --AND THE U.S. SUPREME COURT