In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as well President Grant’s VP…

In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as well President Grant’s VP…

Upworthy

Published

[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Since the outset of the Section 3 litigation, those seeking to disqualify Trump from the ballot have made two primary arguments concerning the Appointments Clause. First, they argued that whatever the phrase "Officers of the United…

#sethbarretttillman #section3 #trump #appointmentsclause #respondents #supremecourt #colorado #protempore #constitution #electoralcollege

Full Article